Norm Activation Theory- Shalom Schwartz (1977)
This main aspect of this theory is
that the personal norms are the main direct element that decides pro-social
behaviour and is not relating to intention of the person. The author argues
that personal norms usually play a role in creating a strong feeling of moral
obligation, which encourages pro-social behaviour. “Schwartz argued that some
behaviours are intended quite specifically ‘to benefit another as an expression
of internal values, without regard for.. social and material reinforcements’ “
There are two main psychological
aspects that determines the internalised personal norms:
1- Awareness
of Consequences
2- Ascription
of responsibility
The intensity of the relationship
between personal norm and behaviour varies and is strong when one is aware of
the negative consequences of choosing not to engage in pro-social behaviour,
but accepts responsibility for the consequences. On the other hand, it is weak
when one doesn’t know the negative consequences and denies responsibility.

I could see the difference between the two and why it could be a critique for the theory as it doesn't see that intention of the person decides the behavior. This could also act as a critique to the theory of reason action which is also similar to the theory of planned behavior.
ReplyDeleteI could see the difference between the two and why it could be a critique for the theory as it doesn't see that intention of the person decides the behavior. This could also act as a critique to the theory of reason action which is also similar to the theory of planned behavior.
ReplyDelete