So the connectivist team structure seems to be where
entrepreneurial teams are headed – and even intrapreneurial teams within
organizations too. It does sound
great in theory – building a wider network of knowledge that doesn’t just exist
within the main group, decision making is distributed and there’s possibility
for many CEOs. But this makes me think, maybe there might be “too many cooks in the
kitchen.” Anyone else?
I’ll relate it to the company I worked at before beginning
this program – an online school that has been around for over 20 years but
still maintained a startup mentality: young, gutsy and even eco-friendly. There
was a relatively flat management structure – not a lot of hierarchy but a ton
of managers at or around the same level. At times it felt like chaos – who is
in control here? No one to rein in the good ideas, re-focus the not so good ones
and direct the organization.
So I can’t help but think an entrepreneurial team might have
the same issues – especially if the team is large with lots of type-A
personalities. Or maybe the chaos is just a byproduct of the theory and meant to
challenge the group!

Cool Jenn, but one of the key things here is to find and possibly share readings/resources that query or qualify the notion of connectivism (very early days) and constructivism (more established) and their roles as explainers of the processes that constitute entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial teams
ReplyDelete